She contends you to definitely cohabitation transformed their unique relationships into an appropriate relationships a long time before the new nine-day several months

P.R

New claimant taken out disabled widow’s insurance policies experts on worker’s income list, but the Secretary refuted their software while the claimant did not meet up with the 9-times duration-of-wedding criteria for the 42 You.S.C. 416(c). Which denial are upheld from the district legal. The new claimant following appealed towards the U.S. Court off Is attractive toward Very first Circuit. The legal from is attractive listed one Puerto Rico cannot accept common-legislation marriage ceremonies hence the prerequisites to possess setting-up a valid marriage inside the Puerto Rico are set onward in the Blog post 69 of the Municipal Password, 30 L.Good. § 231. The brand new courtroom found that, in this situation, the requirements of Article 69 was basically obviously perhaps not found 9 weeks ahead of the worker’s demise. The courtroom next learned that the new claimant’s constitutional “equal cover” attack towards the 9-month course-of-matrimony specifications try invalid significantly less than Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 You.S. 749, 95 S.Ct. 2457, forty-five L.Ed.2d 522 (1975), and you will Mathews v. de Castro, 429 U.S. 181, 97 S.Ct. 431, 50 L.Ed.2d 389 (1976). The latest claimant and additionally contended you to definitely, because she is actually the latest worker’s concubine, she got a right less than Puerto Rican laws so you can inherit away from the fresh new worker’s estate while the their widow, and you may she will likely be deemed to be the fresh new widow of your own employee lower than 42 U.S.C. 416(h)(1)(A). The fresh court away from appeals discovered that, less than Puerto Rican legislation, an effective concubine of a member of staff possess a right to a portion of the house gotten over the course of concubinage however, do not have a directly to inherit a great widow’s display of your own dry worker’s intestate individual possessions. Therefore, brand new claimant could not be deemed becoming brand new widow out-of brand new staff below 42 You.S.C. 416(h)(1)(A) by applying of regulations of Puerto Rico towards the intestate sequence. For the upholding the brand new region court’s decision affirming the Secretary’s denial out-of so it allege for widow’s positives, the fresh judge regarding is attractive held that claimant wasn’t called in order to girls pretty ethiopian advantages once the disabled widow of your own staff member.

Appellant Esther Ayuso Morales sought for Societal Protection handicap positives depending her position since the “widow” of the covered staff member Honorio Montanez Figueroa. Around 42 You.S.C. § 416(c) so you’re able to qualify as a beneficial “widow” a female need been partnered for around 9 weeks at the time of their particular partner’s demise. Appellant’s marriage happened during the nine-week months. Masters was in fact declined.

She contended one, just like the she and the worker had cohabited getting 2 decades early in the day towards go out of their ceremonial relationship, its cohabitation had turned the relationships to your an appropriate relationship better through to the 9-day months

Into the interest, she appetite one she actually is nevertheless eligible once the she cohabited which have their unique spouse to have two decades ahead of its matrimony. She adds that, anyway, lower than 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(1)(A) a candidate try good widow when the she would, “within the statutes . . . [out of Puerto Rico] deciding the fresh devolution off intestate individual assets, have a similar standing . . . just like the a spouse . . . [or] widow. . . .” Select fundamentally, Rombauer, Marital Standing and you may Eligibility having Government Statutory Earnings Experts: An old Questionnaire, 52 Wash.L.Rev. 227, 257 ainsi que. seq. (1977). She states that concubinage legislation regarding Puerto Rico provides their particular such as condition.

We simply cannot deal with appellant’s first argument. We understand one to some typically common laws jurisdictions admit non-ceremonial or “common-law marriages.” Such marriages are built because of the concur of your own events once the some other package. F.W. Kuchlar, Laws out-of Wedding and you can Wedding step one-5 (2d ed. 1978); find O.Elizabeth. Koegel, Common-law ent in the us (1922). However, common law marriages aren’t approved from inside the Puerto Rico. The brand new requisites of a legitimate matrimony within the Puerto Rico are set forth inside the Post 69 of Municipal Password, 29 L.A. § 231. Provided of the requisites ‘s the “[a]uthorization and you can affair off a great matrimonial offer depending on the variations and you will solemnities given legally.” On the lack of these types of models and solemnities, there can be no wedding. Rivera v. Section Court regarding San Juan, 58 Roentgen. 352, 354 (1941); Vazquez Bote, Notas sobre este matrimonio durante derecho puertoriqueno, 49-56 Rev. 491, 493-94, 510-several (1973-75). Elizabeth. Lalaguana Dominguez, Estudios de derecho matrimonial 244-forty-five (1962).

0 respostas

Deixe uma resposta

Quer juntar-se a discussão?
Sinta-se à vontade para contribuir!

Deixe uma resposta

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *