New Salvadoran Individual Legal rights Fee: Studies Operating, Analysis Icon, and you can Producing Analytical Accounts

Baseball, P. (2000). Within the P. Baseball, H. F. Spirer, & L. Spirer (Eds.), Putting some Circumstances: Investigating Major Person Legal rights Abuses Using Pointers Solutions and you may Research Analysis. AAAS.

Belin, T. Roentgen., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). A method to have calibrating untrue-fits rates during the list linkage. Diary of the Western Mathematical Connection, 90(430), 694–707.

Bilenko, M., & Mooney, R. J. (2003). Transformative Backup Identification Using Learnable String Resemblance Procedures. From inside the KDD ’03 (pp. 39–48). ACM.

Christen, P. (2008). Automatic List Linkage Playing with Seeded Nearby Neighbor and you may Assistance Vector Host Category. Into the KDD ’08 (pp. 151–159). ACM.

Christen, P. (2012). A survey out-of indexing suggestions for scalable listing linkage and you may deduplication. IEEE Deals into Degree and you will Investigation Technology, 24(9), https://internationalwomen.net/fi/kazakstanin-naiset/ 1537–1555.

Cohen, W., Raviku). A comparison out-of sequence metrics getting complimentary names and you can ideas. For the KDD workshop on the investigation tidy up and object consolidation (Vol. step 3, pp. 73–78).

Copas, J., & Hilton, F. (1990). Checklist linkage: Mathematical activities to have complimentary desktop facts. Log of your Royal Analytical Area, Series An excellent, 153(3), 287–320.

Dai, A beneficial. Meters., & Storkey, A. J. (2011). The brand new categorized author-point design to own unsupervised entity quality. In Artificial sensory companies and you will machine studying–icann 2011 (pp. 241–249). Springer.

Fortini, Yards., Liseo, B., Nuccitelli, Good., & Scanu, Yards. (2001). Towards the Bayesian Listing Linkage. Lookup within the Official Analytics, 4(1), 185–198.

Gutman, R., Afendulis, C., & Zaslavsky, An effective. (2013). Good bayesian procedure for file connecting to analyze stop- of-life medical costs. Diary of Western Statistical Relationship, 108(501), 34–47.

Hsu, W., Lee, M. L., Liu, B., & Ling, T. W. (2000). Mining Mining inside the Diabetic patients Database: Conclusions and Conclusions. In KDD ’00 (pp. 430–436). ACM.

A split-blend Markov chain Monte Carlo procedure of the fresh Dirichlet process mixture design

Jewell, Letter. P., Spagat, Yards., & Jewell, B. L. (2013). MSE and Casualty Counts: Presumptions, Translation, and Demands. In T. B. Seybolt, J. D. Aronson, & B. Fischhoff (Eds.), Depending Civil Casualties: An introduction to Recording and you will Estimating Nonmilitary Deaths incompatible. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Drive.

Larsen, Yards. D. (2002)ments into Hierarchical Bayesian List Linkage. When you look at the Procedures of the combined mathematical meetings, section to your survey look steps (pp. 1995–2000). The new American Statistical Relationship.

Steorts, R

Larsen, Yards. D. (2005). Improves inside the Record Linkage Concept: Hierarchical Bayesian Listing Linkage Idea. From inside the Process of one’s combined analytical group meetings, area to your questionnaire lookup procedures (pp. 3277–3284). Brand new Western Mathematical Relationship.

Larsen, Yards. D., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Iterative automated listing linkage playing with blend models. Record of your own American Analytical Organization, 96(453), 32–41.

Lum, K., Rates, Meters. Age., & Banking companies, D. (2013). Programs regarding Numerous Expertise Quote into the Person Liberties Look. The fresh Western Statistician, 67(4), 191–two hundred.

Marchant, Letter. Grams., C., Kaplan, A great., Rubinstein, B. I. P., & Elazar, D. Letter. (2019). D-blink: Delivered prevent-to-end bayesian organization solution.

McCallum, A good., & Wellner, B. (2004). Conditional Different types of Label Suspicion that have Application so you’re able to Noun Coreference. For the Enhances inside sensory recommendations control possibilities (nips ’04) (pp. 905–912). MIT Force.

Miller, P. L., Frawley, S. J., & Sayward, F. G. (2000). IMM/Scrub: A domain name-Specific Equipment towards the Deduplication out-of Vaccination Record Info when you look at the Teens Immunization Registriesputers and you may Biomedical Research, 33(2), 126–143.

Murphy, J., Brackbill, Roentgen. M., Thalji, L., Dolan, Meters., Pulliam, P., & Walker, D. J. (2007). Calculating and Boosting Coverage global Change Cardiovascular system Wellness Registry. Statistics from inside the Treatments, 26(8), 1688–1701.

Murray, J. S. (2016). Probabilistic record linkage and deduplication once indexing, clogging, and you will selection. Record out of Privacy and you may Privacy, 7(1), 3–24.

Newcombe, H. B., Kennedy, J. M., Axford, S. J., & James, Good. P. (1959). Automatic linkage out-of vital records servers are often used to extract” follow-up” analytics regarding parents from data out-of regime suggestions. Science, 130(3381), 954–959.

Sadinle, Meters. (2014). Detecting Duplicates during the a homicide Registry Playing with a great Bayesian Partitioning Means. Annals off Used Statistics, 8(4), 2404–2434.

Sariyar, Yards., Borg, An effective., & Pommerening, K. (2012). Productive Discovering Tricks for the fresh Deduplication away from Digital Diligent Investigation Playing with Classification Trees. Record regarding Biomedical Informatics, 45(5), 893–900.

C., Hallway, Roentgen., & Fienberg, S. Elizabeth. (2016). An excellent Bayesian Approach to Visual Number Linkage and you may Deduplication. Record of Western Mathematical Connection, 111(516), 1660–1672.

Tancredi, Good., & Liseo, B. (2011). A beneficial hierarchical Bayesian approach to number linkage and you can inhabitants proportions issues. Annals from Applied Statistics, 5(2B), 1553–1585.